Preview

Russian neurological journal

Advanced search

Effect of Motor Imagery Training with “Brain–Computer” Interface Control on Anxiety and Depression in Post-Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial

https://doi.org/10.30629/2658-7947-2026-31-1-24-30

Abstract

Background. Emotional disorders are identified in more than 30% of post-stroke patients and are associated with delayed recovery and increased long-term mortality. Emerging evidence suggests a positive effect of motor imagery training on the correction of anxiety-depressive disorders; however, data regarding the magnitude and clinical significance of this effect remain contradictory.

Objective. To analyze the impact of motor imagery training under braincomputer interface (BCI). control on the severity of anxiety and depression in post-stroke patients according to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Material and methods. A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 113 participants in the multicenter randomized controlled trial iMove (2015–2017). The main group (n = 79) received training with BCI-exoskeleton technology, while the control group (n = 34) received training with a simulator. Both groups underwent standard rehabilitation. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the HADS scale before and after the rehabilitation course.

Results. After the rehabilitation course, both groups showed significant improvement in anxiety and depression scores (p < 0.05). However, no statistically significant between-group differences were detected (p > 0.05). In subgroups with more pronounced disorders, significant improvement was demonstrated only in the main group, while the values remained within the subclinical range.

Conclusion. Adding motor imagery training under BCI control did not lead to additional improvement in the emotional sphere. Prospective studies with more severe baseline disorders and accounting for concomitant psychopharmacotherapy are needed.

About the Authors

V. V. Labor
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Moscow.



P. D. Bobrov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Moscow.



O. A. Mokienko
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Russian Center of Neurology and Neuroscience
Russian Federation

Moscow.



References

1. Arkhincheyeva NTs, Balkhayev IM, Shadapova AKh. PostStroke Psychoemotional Disorders and Modern Pharmacotherapy. Bulletin of Buryat State University. Medicine and Pharmacy. 2024;70(1):3‒12 (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.18101/2306-19952024-1-3-12

2. Gogoleva AG, Zakharov VV. Anxiety-Depressive Disorders in Patients After Stroke: Prevalence, Approaches to Diagnosis and Therapy. E`ff ektivnaya Farmakoterapiya. 2019;15(34):36–44 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33978/2307-3586-2019-15-34-36-44

3. Chen CH, Chang TY, Sung PS, Su HC, Chou CH, Tung H, Tsai LK, Tang SC, Jeng JS. An overview of post-stroke disability. J Formos Med Assoc. 2025:S0929664625005832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2025.10.038

4. Lee EH, Kim JW, Kang HJ, Kim SW, Kim JT, Park MS, Cho KH, Kim JM. Association between Anxiety and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Stroke: A 1-Year Longitudinal Study. Psychiatry Investig. 2019;16(12):919–25. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2019.0188

5. Hurst AJ, Boe SG. Imagining the way forward: A review of contemporary motor imagery theory. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:1033493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.1033493

6. Mokienko OA, Lyukmanov RKh, Bobrov PD, Suponeva NA, Piradov MA. Brain–Computer Interfaces for Upper Limb Motor Recovery after Stroke: Current Status and Development Prospects (Review). Sovrem Tehnol V Med. 2023;15(6):63. https://doi.org/10.17691/stm2023.15.6.07

7. Jiang H, Chen C, Hao X. The intervention eff ects of motor-guided imagery training on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in stroke patients. Chin J Rehabil Med. 2020;35(6):738–40.

8. Haire CM, Vuong V, Tremblay L, Patterson KK, Chen JL, Thaut MH. Eff ects of therapeutic instrumental music performance and motor imagery on chronic post-stroke cognition and aff ect: A randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2021;48(2):195–208. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-208014

9. Luo M, Zhou H, Hao X. Eff ect of characteristic guided motor imagery on anxiety, depression, and disability acceptance in stroke patients with hemiplegia. J HeBei United Univ Health Sci. 2022;24(2):137–42. https://doi.org/10.19539/j.cnki.2095-2694.2022.02.008

10. Ren Y, Xu L, Ren S, Cui Z, Yan Y, Zhou M, Xu Y. The Eff ect of Exercise Imagination Therapy on Upper Limb Function Rehabilitation, Sleep Disorders, and Psychological Status in Patients with Hemiplegia after Stroke. Journal of International Psychiatry. 2024;51(5):1533–42. https://doi.org/10.13479/j.cnki.jip.2024.05.007

11. Pogonchenkova IV, Kostenko EV, Petrova LV, et al. Brain-computer interface with hand exoskeleton: new rehabilitation possibilities. Moskovskaya meditsina. 2022;4(50):20–5. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49561218&ysclid=map3i4gomv210531734

12. Hu Y, Li Y, Leung AYM, Li J, Mei X, Montayre J, Tao R, Yorke J. A scoping review on motor imagery-based rehabilitation: Potential working mechanisms and clinical application for cognitive function and depression. Clin Rehabil. 2025;39(4):504–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241313174

13. Frolov AA, Mokienko OA, Lyukmanov Rh, Chernikova LA, Kotov SV, Turbina LG, et al. Preliminary results of a controlled study of BCI-exoskeleton technology efficacy in patients with poststroke arm paresis. Bulletin of RSMU. 2016;(2):16–23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2016-02-02

14. Frolov A, Mokienko O, Lyukmanov R, Biryukova E, Kotov S, Turbina L, Nadareyshvily G, Bushkova Y.. Post-stroke Rehabilitation Training with a Motor-Imagery-Based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-Controlled Hand Exoskeleton: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00400

15. Kotov SV, Isakova EV, Sheregeshev VI. Possibility of treatment of emotional and behavioral disorders in patients with stroke during rehabilitation. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2019;119(4):26-31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro201911904126

16. Moriya M, Aoki C, Sakatani K. Eff ects of Physical Exercise on Working Memory and Prefrontal Cortex Function in PostStroke Patients. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;923:203–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38810-6_27

17. Dijkerman HC, Ietswaart M, Johnston M, MacWalter RS. Does motor imagery training improve hand function in chronic stroke patients? A pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(5):538–49. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr769oa

18. Labor VV, Mokienko OA, Cherkasova AN, Ikonnikova ES, Lyukmanov RKh, Suponeva NA. Motor Imagery Training and Brain-Computer Interface in Cognitive Rehabilitation: Effi cacy and Prospects for Use in Neurology. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2025;125(11):27–35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202512511127


Review

For citations:


Labor V.V., Bobrov P.D., Mokienko O.A. Effect of Motor Imagery Training with “Brain–Computer” Interface Control on Anxiety and Depression in Post-Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Russian neurological journal. 2026;31(1):24-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30629/2658-7947-2026-31-1-24-30

Views: 201

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-7947 (Print)
ISSN 2686-7192 (Online)