Possibilities of modern remote technologies in neurorehabilitation
https://doi.org/10.30629/2658-7947-2023-28-5-14-20
Abstract
The purpose — is to study the available scientific data on the effectiveness of the application of remote rehabilitation technologies in patients with cerebral pathology at the present stage.
Material and methods. The search for relevant publications was carried out using the databases Cochrane Library, eLIBRARY.RU, PubMed, Google academy, MedLine, EBSCO, Scopus, Web of science, PEDro, CINAHL, Eric, Springer/nature, Elsevier. The review included 48 papers (systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials) concerning the use of remote rehabilitation methods in patients with cerebral pathology.
Results. Telerehabilitation has been shown to be an emerging healthcare field and the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated this development. The use of new technologies in the rehabilitation of patients with impaired motor and cognitive functions will improve the quality of care provided for medical rehabilitation, ensuring the continuity and succession of ongoing activities. The use of remote rehabilitation is comparable or even superior in clinical results to an alternative to home training, and the controlled format helps to increase the motivation of patients and improve efficiency. Limitations and obstacles to the implementation of specific technologies are given, ways to overcome them are shown.
About the Authors
I. P. Yastrebtseva
Ivanovo State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yastrebtseva Irina P.
Ivanovo.
A. A. Sokolova
Ivanovo State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ivanovo.
References
1. Snopkov P.S., Lyadov K.V., Shapovalenko T.V., Sidyakina I.V. Distant rehabilitation: the sources, current state-of-the-art, and further prospects. Russin journal of the physical therapy, balneotherapy and rehabilitation. 2016;15(3):141–145. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18821/1681-3456-2016-15-3-141-145
2. Yastrebtseva I.P., Daminov V.D., Deryabkina L.Yu., Vyalkova S.V., Makshantsevа K.V. Remote Rehabilitation of Patients with Impaired Motor Functions in Cerebral Pathology. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2021;20(1):45–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2021-20-1-45-50
3. Nuara A., Fabbri-Destro M., Scalona E., Lenzi S., Rizzolatti G., Avanzini P. Telerehabilitation in response to constrained physical distance: an opportunity to rethink neurorehabilitative routines. Journal of Neurology. 2022;269:627–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10397-w
4. Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A. Remote medical consultations for patients: what has changed in Russia in 20 years. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2021;7(2):7–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2021-7-2-7-17
5. Stasolla F., Matamala-Gomez M., Bernini S., Caffò A.O., Bottiroli S. Virtual Reality as a Technological-Aided Solution to Support Communication in Persons With Neurodegenerative Diseases and Acquired Brain Injury During COVID-19 Pandemic. Front. Public Health. 2021;8:635426. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.635426
6. Prikaz Ministerstva zdravookhraneniya RF ot 30 noyabrya 2017 g. № 965n “Ob utverzhdenii poryadka organizatsii i okazaniya meditsinskoy pomoshchi s primeneniem telemeditsinskikh tekhnologiy”. 2018. (In Russ.). https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71751294/ 17.04.2023
7. Gusev A.V., Ivshin A.A., Vladzymyrskyy A.V. Healthcare in the smartphone: the situation in Russia. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2021;7(3):21–31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2021-7-3-21-31
8. Rozanov V.A., Samerkhanova K.M. Mobile applications for mental health selfmanagement: a review of customers’ opinions. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2022;8(2):7–20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2022-8-2-7-20
9. Nikolaev V.A., Safonicheva O.G., Nikolaev A.A. Telerehabilitation of Post-Stroke Patients with Motor Function Disorders: A Review. Adv Gerontol. 2022;12:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079057022030109
10. Nikolaev V.A., Nikolaev A.A. Recent Trends in Telerehabilitation of Stroke Patients: A Narrative Review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2022;51(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-210330
11. Knepley K.D., Mao J.Z., Wieczorek P., Okoye F.O., Jain A.P., Harel N.Y. Impact of telerehabilitation for stroke-related defi cits. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2021;27(3):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0019
12. Rintala A., Päivärinne V., Hakala S., Paltamaa J., Heinonen A., Karvane J., Sjögren T. Effectiveness of technology-based distance physical rehabilitation interventions for improving physical functioning in stroke: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2019;100(7):1339–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.007
13. Hayes D. Telerehabilitation for Older Adults. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2020;36(4):205–211. https://doi.org/10.1097/tgr.0000000000000282
14. Laver K.E., Adey-Wakeling Z., Crotty M., Lannin N.A., George S., Sherrington C. Telerehabilitation services for stroke (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020;1(CD010255). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010255.pub3
15. Burgos P.I., Lara O., Lavado A., Rojas-Sepúlveda I., Delgado C., Bravo E. et al. Exergames and Telerehabilitation on Smartphones to Improve Balance in Stroke Patients. Brain Sci. 2020;10(11):773–781. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110773
16. Pagliari C., Di Tella S., Jonsdottir J., Mendozzi L., Rovaris M., De Icco R. et al. Effects of home-based virtual reality telerehabilitation system in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X211054839
17. Alayat M.S., Almatrafi N.A., Almutairi A.A., El Fiky A.A.R., Elsodany A.M. The Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation on Balance and Functional Mobility in Patients with Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2022;14(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2022.6532
18. Marzano G., Lubkina V. A Review of Telerehabilitation Solutions for Balance Disorders. Procedia Computer Science. 2017;104:250–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.132
19. Dodakian L., McKenzie A.L., Le V., See J., Pearson-Fuhrhop K., Burke Quinlan E. et al. A Home-Based Telerehabilitation Program for Patients With Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(10–11):923–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317733818
20. Cramer S.C., Dodakian L., Le V., See J., Augsburger R., McKenzie A. et al. National Institutes of Health StrokeNet Telerehab Investigators. Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(9):1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604
21. Peretti A., Amenta F., Tayebati S.K., Nittari G., Mahdi S.S. Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;4(2):e7. https://doi.org/10.2196/rehab.7511
22. Yang C.L., Waterson S., Eng J.J. Implementation and Evaluation of the Virtual Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) for Individuals with Stroke During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. Physical Therapy. 2021;101(6):pzab083. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab083
23. Allegue D.R., Kairy D., Higgins J., Archambault P.S., Michaud F., Miller W.C. et al. A Personalized Home-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Exergames Combined With a Telerehabilitation App in a Chronic Stroke Survivor: Mixed Methods Case Study. JMIR Serious Games. 2021;9(3):e26153. https://doi.org/10.2196/26153
24. Cadilhac D.A., Bagot K.L., Demaerschalk B.M., Hubert G., Schwamm L., Watkins C.L. et al. Establishment of an internationally agreed minimum data set for acute telestroke. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27(9):582–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X19899262
25. Rintala A., Hakala S., Paltamaa J., Heinonen A., Karvanen J., Sjögren T. Effectiveness of technology-based distance physical rehabilitation interventions on physical activity and walking in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(4):373–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1260649
26. Campbell K.R., Wilhelm J.L., Pettigrew N.C., Scanlan K.T., Chesnutt J.C., King L.A. Implementation and Adoption of Telerehabilitation for Treating Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2022;46(4):E1–E10. https://doi.org/10.1097/npt.0000000000000409
27. Ng E.M., Polatajko H.J., Marziali E., Hunt A., Dawson D.R. Telerehabilitation for addressing executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27(5):548–564. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.766927
28. Chen J., Sun D., Zhang S., Shi Y., Qiao F., Zhou Y. et al. Effects of home-based telerehabilitation in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2020;95(17):2318–2330. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010821
29. Ivanilova T.N., Prokopenko S.V., Popov A.A., Demidyuk V.D., Buslov I.A., Subocheva S.A. Project design portal teleservicing neurorehabilitation “Neyrodom”. Medical Doctor and IT. 2019;1:73–80. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/proektnye-resheniya-portala-distantsionnoy-neyroreabilitatsiineyrodom/viewer. 21.04.2023
30. Baranovskaya E.N., Bronnikov V.A., Buylova T.V, Daminov V.D., Kizeev M.V., Koneva E.S. et al. Distantsionno-kontroliruemaya reabilitatsiya (kompleksnaya meditsinskaya reabilitatsiya s primeneniem telemeditsinskoy tekhnologii) dlya patsientov so spasticheskim gemiparezom posle perenesennogo ostrogo narusheniya mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya (ONMK) ili cherepno-mozgovoy travmy (ChMT). Klinicheskie rekomendatsii. 2019. (In Russ.). https://rehabrus.ru/Docs/2020/15122018-klinicheskie-rekomendacii-dkr.PDF. 25.04.2023
31. Melehin A.I. Remote cognitive behavioral psychotherapy for stress disorder associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2020;(3):3–14. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29188/2542-2413-2020-6-3-3-14
32. Savin S.Z., Kosykh N.E. Telemedicine technologies for organizing the work of psychiatric services for the prevention of depressive disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2020;6(4):8–14. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29188/2542-2413-2020-6-4-8-14
33. Morrell K., Hyers M., Stuchiner T., Lucas L., Schwartz K., Mako J. et al. Telehealth Stroke Dysphagia Evaluation Is Safe and Effective. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;44 (3–4):225–231. https://doi.org/10.1159/000478107
34. Whelan B.M., Theodoros D., Cahill L., Vaezipour A., Vogel A.P., Finch E. et al. Feasibility of a Telerehabilitation Adaptation of the Be Clear Speech Treatment Program for Non-Progressive Dysarthria. Brain Sci. 2022;12(2):197. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020197
35. Holst A., Nejati S., Björkelund C., Eriksson M.C., Hange D., Kivi M. et al. Patients’ experiences of a computerised self-help program for treating depression — a qualitative study of Internet mediated cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35(1):46–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1288813
36. Vladzymyrskyy A.V. Matrix for direct-to-consumer telemedicine quality assessing. Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2020;6(4):37–44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29188/2542-2413-2020-6-4-34-44
37. Lloréns R., Noé E., Colomer C., Alcañiz M. Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.019
38. Raso M.G., Arcuri F., Liperoti S., Mercurio L., Mauro A., Cusato F. et al. Telemonitoring of Patients With Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study. Front Neurol. 2021;12:598777. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.598777
39. Hubert G.J., Santo G., Vanhooren G., Zvan B., Tur Campos S., Alasheev A. et al. Recommendations on telestroke in Europe. Eur Stroke J. 2019;4(2):101–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987318806718
40. Sarfo F.S., Ulasavets U., Opare-Sem O.K., Ovbiagele B. TeleRehabilitation after Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(9):2306–2318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.013
41. Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A. Remote health monitoring: motivating patients. Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2020;(3):37–43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29188/2542-2413-2020-6-3-37-43
42. Mechanic O.J., Persaud Y., Kimball A.B. Telehealth Systems. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2023. PMID: 29083614.
43. Marcoux R.M., Vogenberg F.R. Telehealth: Applications From a Legal and Regulatory Perspective. Pharmacy and therapeutics. 2016;41(9):567–570. PMID: 27630526.
44. Cole B., Pickard K., Stredler-Brown A. Report on the use of telehealth in early intervention in Colorado: Strengths and challenges with telehealth as a service delivery method. International Journal of Telerehabilitation. 2019;11(1):33–40. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2019.6273
45. Telehealth: Defining 21st Century Care. ATA — ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2020. https://marketing.americantelemed.org/hubfs/Files/Resources/ATA_Telehealth_Taxonomy_9-11-20.pdf. 23.04.2023
46. Vershinin G.S., Vinyarskaya I.V., Тerletskaya R.N., Chernikov V.V., Аprosimova S.I., Babayan А.R. Evaluation of availability and quality of telemedicine consultations in pediatric medical aid administration (upon the results of doctors questionnaire survey). Bulletin of the Ivanovo Medical Academy. 2021;26(3):20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52246/1606-8157_2021_26_3_18
47. Shaderkin I.A. Telemedicine barriers and ways to overcome them. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health. 2022;8(2):59–76. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2022-8-2-59-76
48. Scott Kruse C., Karem P., Shifflett K., Vegi L., Ravi K., Brooks M. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2018;24(1):4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16674087
Review
For citations:
Yastrebtseva I.P., Sokolova A.A. Possibilities of modern remote technologies in neurorehabilitation. Russian neurological journal. 2023;28(5):14-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30629/2658-7947-2023-28-5-14-20
Views:
481
Email this article 